The client asked for current state
You need to understand a client environment before an audit, migration, modernization, or risk decision.
For consultants, architects, vCISOs, and transformation teams
Turn a client’s scattered knowledge into a defensible current-state architecture.
When documentation is missing, outdated, or contradictory, Diogrum gives you the engagement workflow to interview the right people, collect the right evidence, determine what is actually known, and deliver a source-linked current state.
No documents requiredFirst collection packet in minutesStart privately in your browser
What Diogrum produces
One traceable engagement package—not another orphaned diagram.
Client discovery packet
Questionnaire, stakeholder plan, interview prompts, and evidence request.
Sourced current state
Systems, boundaries, data, access, operations, sources, and visible unknowns.
Evidence review queue
Architecture claims compared with documents, exports, and machine evidence.
Review-ready handoff
Editable architecture, findings, decisions, assumptions, and source trail.
You remain the accountable advisor. Diogrum keeps the interviews, claims, evidence, unknowns, and decisions connected.
You are in the right place if…
The client needs an answer before the evidence is organized.
Diogrum begins where most architecture tools assume the work is already finished: before the interviews, before the inventory is clean, and before anyone agrees which version is true.
The source material is a mess
The useful knowledge is split across interviews, screenshots, old diagrams, spreadsheets, and people’s heads.
A polished diagram is not enough
You cannot tell which diagram claims are current, inferred, contradicted, or still waiting for evidence.
Someone has to defend the result
The client, auditor, or design authority needs the reasoning and evidence behind the architecture—not just boxes.
What it is
The engagement layer between “we need to understand this” and “we can defend this.”
Keep your cloud consoles, document stores, ticketing systems, and drawing tools. Diogrum structures the consulting work that turns their fragments into an architecture decision package.
01
Discover
Create the engagement, identify what exists, choose stakeholder interviews, and send a concrete client collection packet.
02
Build current state
Bring back transcripts, screenshots, diagrams, documents, inventories, and exports with owners, dates, scope, and confidence.
03
Review and hand off
Separate confirmed facts from claims and conflicts, produce the editable architecture, and preserve the decision trail.
Why not just use Visio, draw.io, or AI?
Those tools draw what you tell them. Diogrum helps determine what you can responsibly claim.
A generic AI can make a convincing picture from a prompt. It does not automatically preserve who said what, which environment a screenshot came from, where sources conflict, or why a reviewer accepted a finding. That traceability is the product.
Start from your next client requestArchitecture claim review
Production data boundary
Stakeholder statement
“Production administrators always connect through VPN and MFA.”
Platform owner interview · August 12
Evidence status
VPN configuration received. Break-glass administrative path remains unverified.
Owner assigned · Evidence due August 19
Keep the unknown visible
Do not turn a confident interview answer into a verified architecture claim until the missing path is resolved or disclosed.
Start before the client has everything ready
Your first useful output is the collection plan—not the final diagram.
Create the engagement, select what exists, and leave with the questionnaire and interviews needed to build current state.